Me (![[info]](http://p-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} amusedmaze) wrote,@ 2006-11-24 15:21:00 |
|
Woah.
To decide what the best use of it is, you must ask what use the Enemy wants to make of it, and then do the opposite. Now it may surprise you to learn that in His efforts to get permanent possesion of a soul, He relies on the troughs more than the peaks; some of His special favourites have gone through longer and deeper troughs than anyone else. The reason is this. To us a human is primarily food; our aim is the absorbtion of its will into ours, the increase of our own area of selfhood at its expense. But the obedience which the Enemy demands of men is quite a different thing. One must face the fact that all the talk about His love for men, and His service being perfect freedom, is not (as one would gladly believe) mere propoganda, but an appalling truth. He really DOES want to fill the universe with a lot of little loathesome replicas of Himself - creatures whose life, on its miniature scale, will be qualitively like His own, not because He has absorbed them but because their wills freely conform to His. We want cattle who can finally become food; He wants servants who can finally beocme sons. We want to suck in; He wants to give out. We are empty and would be filled; He is full and flows over. Our war aim is a world in which Our Father Below has drawn all other beings into himself: the Enemy wants a world full of beings united to Him but still distinct.
The last sentence separates perfectly (in my mind) the difference between the liberal agenda and the conservative purpose.
To decide what the best use of it is, you must ask what use the Enemy wants to make of it, and then do the opposite. Now it may surprise you to learn that in His efforts to get permanent possesion of a soul, He relies on the troughs more than the peaks; some of His special favourites have gone through longer and deeper troughs than anyone else. The reason is this. To us a human is primarily food; our aim is the absorbtion of its will into ours, the increase of our own area of selfhood at its expense. But the obedience which the Enemy demands of men is quite a different thing. One must face the fact that all the talk about His love for men, and His service being perfect freedom, is not (as one would gladly believe) mere propoganda, but an appalling truth. He really DOES want to fill the universe with a lot of little loathesome replicas of Himself - creatures whose life, on its miniature scale, will be qualitively like His own, not because He has absorbed them but because their wills freely conform to His. We want cattle who can finally become food; He wants servants who can finally beocme sons. We want to suck in; He wants to give out. We are empty and would be filled; He is full and flows over. Our war aim is a world in which Our Father Below has drawn all other beings into himself: the Enemy wants a world full of beings united to Him but still distinct.
The last sentence separates perfectly (in my mind) the difference between the liberal agenda and the conservative purpose.
